@article{Krzywon2020, author = {Adam Krzywon}, title = {La justicia europea contra la reducci{\´o}n arbitraria de la edad de jubilaci{\´o}n de los jueces. Comentario a la Sentencia del TJUE de 24 de junio de 2019, Comisi{\´o}n/Polonia, C-619/18}, series = {LEGAL - Revista del Parlamento Vasco}, volume = {2020}, number = {1}, publisher = {Redacci{\´o}n LEGAL}, address = {Vitoria-Gasteiz}, issn = {2660-650X}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.47984/legal.2020.007}, url = {https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0246-opus4-48762}, pages = {164 -- 175}, year = {2020}, abstract = {In the judgment of 24 June 2019, Commission v. Poland (Independence of the Supreme Court), C-619/18, EU:C:2019:531, the Court of Justice of the European Union ruled on the retirement of Polish Supreme Court judges, declaring that the mechanism of arbitrary lowering the retirement age was not compatible with the European Union law. This commentary analyses the latest changes in the Polish judicial system and the CJEU's arguments. The study is focused in the change in European case-law and the development of instruments available to the EU institutions for monitoring judicial independence. The paper discusses also the elements of the judicial independence indicated by CJEU and the rules on the retirement of judges.}, language = {es} }