@article{Callewaert2018,
  author    = {Callewaert, Johan},
  title     = {Do we still need Article (6)2 TEU? Considerations on the absence of EU accession to the ECHR and its consequences},
  series = {Common market law review},
  volume    = {55},
  journal   = {Common market law review},
  number    = {6},
  publisher = {Kluwer Law International},
  address   = {Alphen an den Rijn},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0246-opus4-38815},
  pages     = {1685 -- 1716},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Article 6(2) TEU provides that the EU shall accede to the European Convention on Human Rights. However, the EU accession project has been significantly delayed by Opinion 2/13 of the ECJ. At the same time, there appears to be some harmony in the case law of the two European Courts, which could lead to the status quo being considered as a valid alternative to EU accession. It might therefore be tempting to remove Article 6(2) altogether from the TEU at the next revision of the Treaties. This paper argues that Article 6(2) should stay in the TEU, because a closer look reveals that the current status quo is not satisfactory: it does not allow an adequate representation of the EU in the procedure before the European Court of Human Rights, nor is it capable of ensuring in the long-term comprehensive and stable consistency between EU law and the Convention. Moreover, removing Article 6(2) TEU would undermine the very idea of a collective understanding and enforcement of fundamental rights. This could initiate a process leading to the current European architecture of fundamental rights protection being unravelled altogether. Hence, there is no return from Article 6(2) TEU. Neither is there from actually implementing it.},
  subject      = {Europ{\"a}ische Menschenrechtskonvention},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Callewaert2016,
  author    = {Callewaert, Johan},
  title     = {Convergences et divergences dans la protection europ{\´e}enne des droits fondamentaux},
  series = {Journal de droit europ{\´e}en},
  volume    = {24},
  journal   = {Journal de droit europ{\´e}en},
  number    = {229},
  publisher = {Larcier},
  address   = {Br{\"u}ssel},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0246-opus4-20535},
  pages     = {166 -- 174},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {On ne peut plus aujourd'hui s'arr{\^e}ter au contenu des droits fondamentaux sans se demander comment ils sont appliqu{\´e}s. Quand il s'agit pour le droit de l'Union d'appliquer les droits fondamentaux, il semble travers{\´e} par des tensions conceptuelles et m{\´e}thodologiques fortes, {\`a} la recherche d'un point d'{\´e}quilibre. Les d{\´e}veloppements les plus r{\´e}cents cons{\´e}cutifs {\`a} l'avis 2/13 montrent qu'une certaine convergence entre le droit de l'Union et la Convention est possible.},
  language  = {fr}
}
@article{Callewaert2011,
  author    = {Callewaert, Johan},
  title     = {Grundrechtsraum Europa. Die Bedeutung der Grundrechte f{\"u}r den Verwaltungsrechtsraum Europa},
  series = {Die {\"O}ffentliche Verwaltung},
  volume    = {64},
  journal   = {Die {\"O}ffentliche Verwaltung},
  number    = {21},
  publisher = {Kohlhammer},
  address   = {Stuttgart},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0246-opus4-20465},
  pages     = {825 -- 831},
  year      = {2011},
  abstract  = {In einem ersten Schritt wird die Bedeutung der europ{\"a}ischen Grundrechte fur den Verwaltungsrechtsraum Europa anhand einiger konkreter Beispiele untersucht. Im Licht dieser Erkenntnisse wird in einem zweiten Schritt die Frage er{\"o}rtert, inwiefern heute uberhaupt von einem „Grundrechtsraum Europa" gesprochen werden kann, was also ein solcher Grundrechtsraum voraussetzt und was davon bereits erf{\"u}llt ist.},
  language  = {de}
}