@misc{PieskerMuellerEngewald2019, author = {Piesker, Axel and M{\"u}ller, Christoph and Engewald, Bettina}, title = {Interdisziplin{\"a}res Arbeiten in der Praxis der Politikgestaltung: Die Evaluation von Gesetzen. Am Beispiel der Evaluation des Hamburgischen Transparenzgesetzes (HmbTG)}, year = {2019}, abstract = {.}, language = {de} } @article{MuellerGausKonradt2016, author = {M{\"u}ller, Christoph Emanuel and Gaus, Hansj{\"o}rg and Konradt, Ingo}, title = {Predicting Research Productivity in International Evaluation Journals Across Countries}, series = {Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation (JMDE)}, volume = {12}, journal = {Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation (JMDE)}, number = {27}, publisher = {The Evaluation Center}, address = {Kalmazoo, Mich.}, pages = {79 -- 92}, year = {2016}, abstract = {.}, language = {en} } @incollection{MuellerEngewaldHerr2018, author = {M{\"u}ller, Christoph Emanuel and Engewald, Bettina and Herr, Marius}, title = {Freedom of Information in Germany}, series = {The Laws of Transparency in Action}, booktitle = {The Laws of Transparency in Action}, editor = {Dragos, Dacian C. and Kovac, Polonca and Marseille, Albert T.}, edition = {1. Aufl.}, publisher = {Springer International Publishing}, address = {Cham}, isbn = {978-3-319-76460-3}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-76460-3}, publisher = {Deutsches Forschungsinstitut f{\"u}r {\"o}ffentliche Verwaltung}, pages = {205 -- 253}, year = {2018}, abstract = {.}, language = {en} } @article{Mueller2016, author = {M{\"u}ller, Christoph Emanuel}, title = {Accurate Forecast of Countries' Research Output by Macro-Level Indicators}, series = {Scientometrics}, volume = {109}, journal = {Scientometrics}, number = {2}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Dordrecht}, doi = {10.1007/s11192-016-2084-1}, pages = {1307 -- 1328}, year = {2016}, abstract = {.}, language = {en} } @article{MuellerWolf, author = {M{\"u}ller, Christoph E. and Wolf, Birge}, title = {Kann der gesellschaftliche Impact von Forschung gemessen werden? Herausforderungen und alternative Evaluationsans{\"a}tze}, series = {Hochschulmanagement}, volume = {12}, journal = {Hochschulmanagement}, number = {2/3}, publisher = {Univ.-Verl. Webler}, address = {Bielefeld}, pages = {44 -- 50}, abstract = {Measuring societal impacts of research is a challenging task in research evaluation. In this article, we describe several of these challenges with regard to causal inference, time lag, side-effects, operationalization, comparability between disciplines, and availability of required data. We show how different approaches deal with these challenges in evaluation practice and focus on a particular approach named "practice impact" in more detail. This approach includes an improved documentation and is sought to have positive effects on innovation processes and synergies with research and research funding. Moreover, dialogue with different user groups is fostered and serves to make evaluation beyond scientific impact desired, feasible, and efficient.}, language = {de} } @misc{MuellerPiesker2018, author = {M{\"u}ller, Christoph E. and Piesker, Axel}, title = {Gesetzesevaluation in Theorie und Praxis}, year = {2018}, abstract = {.}, language = {de} } @article{MuellerKeilBauer2017, author = {M{\"u}ller, Christoph E. and Keil, Silke I. and Bauer, Christian}, title = {Effects of spatial proximity to proposed high-voltage transmission lines: Evidence from a natural experiment in Lower Saxony}, series = {Energy Policy}, volume = {111}, journal = {Energy Policy}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.09.023}, pages = {137 -- 147}, year = {2017}, abstract = {Governments and energy operators are frequently confronted with opposition to the construction of new energy infrastructure and a lack of public support. This is also true for the planning of new high-voltage overhead transmission lines. In this context, a question of interest for policy makers and energy operators is how residents react when they realize that they may be affected by future transmission lines in close proximity to their homes. This study provides evidence of how local residents respond to the announcement of transmission line corridor route alternatives (TLCRAs). By means of a natural experiment, it estimates the causal effects of spatial proximity to proposed TLCRAs during the planning phase of an energy project. The results reveal that proximity significantly enhanced residents' risk perceptions with respect to landscape deterioration, property/house value reduction, and damages to human health. We also found that increasing proximity decreased residents' support for grid expansion and increased the likelihood of performing information seeking behavior and becoming a member of a local citizens' initiative. Finally, our findings suggest that the relationship between spatial proximity and the dependent variables are appropriately modeled by a distance decay function, showing that effects attenuate with increasing distance from the infrastructure site.}, language = {en} } @article{MuellerKeilBauer2019, author = {M{\"u}ller, Christoph E. and Keil, Silke I. and Bauer, Christian}, title = {Underground cables vs. overhead lines: Quasi-experimental evidence for the effects on public risk expectations, attitudes, and protest behavior}, series = {Energy Policy: The International Journal of the Political, Economic, Planning, Environmental and Social Aspects of Energy}, journal = {Energy Policy: The International Journal of the Political, Economic, Planning, Environmental and Social Aspects of Energy}, number = {125}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam}, issn = {0301-4215}, pages = {456 -- 466}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Governments and energy operators are often confronted with local residents' protest against the construction of new high-voltage overhead transmission lines, negative risk expectations, and a lack of public support. A frequently discussed strategy for dealing with these issues is to build underground cables instead of overhead lines. So far, however, there is not much empirical evidence of whether substituting overhead lines by underground cables actually reduces protest or affects public risk expectations and attitudes. This study contributes to filling this gap by comparing residents' risk expectations, attitudes, and protest behavior observed at two grid expansion sites in Germany by means of a quasi-experiment. At the time when the data were collected, both grid expansion projects-an overhead line project in Lower Saxony and an underground cable project in Hesse-were at the same stage of the legally defined planning and approval procedure. After controlling for various potential confounders, we obtained results revealing that there are no differences in the risk expectations, attitudes, and protest behavior of residents interviewed at the two project sites, or only marginal ones. Hence, our findings do not support the assumption that building underground cables necessarily improves the situation with regard to risk expectations, attitudes, and protest behavior.}, language = {en} } @unpublished{MuellerKeilBauer2019, author = {M{\"u}ller, Christoph E. and Keil, Silke I. and Bauer, Christian}, title = {Informationsveranstaltungen zum Netzausbau: Eine Evaluationsstudie zu Wirksamkeit und Wirkungsweise von ‚Themenm{\"a}rkten'}, doi = {10.13140/RG.2.2.33803.03367}, year = {2019}, abstract = {.}, language = {de} } @misc{MuellerKeil2018, author = {M{\"u}ller, Christoph E. and Keil, Silke I.}, title = {Quasi-experimentelle Wirkungspr{\"u}fung energiepolitischer Infrastrukturmaßnahmen am Beispiel der Erdverkabelung}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Die Planung neuer Hochspannungsleitungen, die f{\"u}r das Gelingen der Energiewende essentiell sind, wird h{\"a}ufig von B{\"u}rgerprotesten und einer mangelnden Akzeptanz innerhalb der lokalen Wohnbev{\"o}lkerung begleitet. Dies kann zu konflikt{\"a}ren Planungs- und Genehmigungsverfah-ren, Verz{\"o}gerungen und Gerichtsverfahren f{\"u}hren. Eine intensiv diskutierte energiepolitische Maßnahme zur Erh{\"o}hung der Akzeptanz besteht in der Substitution von Freileitungen durch Erdkabel, da hierdurch landschaftliche Beeintr{\"a}chtigungen reduziert und somit Einfl{\"u}sse einer wichtigen Ursache mangelnder Akzeptanz abgeschw{\"a}cht werden k{\"o}nnten. Die intendierten Wirkungen der Erdverkabelung wurden bislang nicht hinreichend evaluiert, weshalb am Institut f{\"u}r Gesetzesfolgenabsch{\"a}tzung und Evaluation eine erste quasi-experimentelle Untersuchung zur Identifikation potenzieller Wirkungen durchgef{\"u}hrt wurde. Der Vortrag widmet sich insbesondere dem methodischen Aufbau der Studie und gibt Einbli-cke, wie die Wirksamkeit politischer Infrastrukturmaßnahmen anhand von großangelegten Quasi-Experimenten {\"u}berpr{\"u}ft werden kann. Zur Wirkungspr{\"u}fung wurden die Reaktionen (z.B. Protestverhalten, Einstellungen, erwartete Risiken) der lokalen Wohnbev{\"o}lkerung zweier Regionen miteinander verglichen. In beiden Regionen befinden sich Netzausbauprojekte im gesetzlich geregelten Planungsverfahren. In einer der Regionen ist ein Freileitungsprojekt ge-plant, in der anderen ein Erdkabelprojekt. Zur Gew{\"a}hrleistung der Validit{\"a}t der Wirkungssch{\"a}tzungen wurden Maßnahmen ergriffen, die die Vergleichbarkeit der beiden Fallregionen sicherstellen sollten. So erfolgte die Datener-hebung zu einem Zeitpunkt, zu dem sich die Projekte in der gleichen Phase des Planungsver-fahrens befanden. Zudem wurden Daten zu denselben Variablen erhoben, es kam das gleiche Stichprobenauswahlverfahren zum Einsatz und es wurde die gleiche Befragungsmethodik verwendet. Dar{\"u}ber hinaus wurde ein Propensity Score basiertes Gewichtungsverfahren ge-nutzt, um verzerrende Einfl{\"u}sse beobachteter Drittvariablen auszuschließen. Die Studie ver-f{\"u}gte {\"u}ber eine hohe statistische Power, da insgesamt mehr als 2.600 zuf{\"a}llig ausgew{\"a}hlte Per-sonen in unmittelbarer N{\"a}he zu den vorgeschlagenen Trassenalternativen befragt wurden. Aufgrund des Fallcharakters der Projektregionen war die Studie allerdings auch mit methodi-schen Limitationen konfrontiert, die die Reichweite der Ergebnisse einschr{\"a}nken und die im Vortrag ebenfalls vorgestellt und diskutiert werden.}, language = {de} } @article{MuellerKeil2019, author = {M{\"u}ller, Christoph E. and Keil, Silke I.}, title = {Citizens' initiatives in the context of Germany's power grid expansion: A micro-econometric evaluation of their effects on members' protest behavior}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Energiewirtschaft}, volume = {43}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Energiewirtschaft}, number = {2}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Wiesbaden}, issn = {0343-5377}, doi = {10.1007/s12398-019-00251-y}, pages = {101 -- 116}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Policymakers and transmission system operators frequently face problems when planning and constructing new high-voltage transmission lines because of opposition among local residents. Protest varies due to attributes of the transmission lines (e.g., length and size), site-specific characteristics, and the extent of consternation among local residents. The most controversially discussed grid expansion project in Germany is the SuedLink, which has been causing severe protest among groups of local residents. One driver of public opposition is the existence of local citizens' initiatives. These groups play an important role, for example by influencing the public debate, taking legal action, or mobilizing their members and other citizens into protest. In doing so, they can cause delays due to confrontational planning and approval procedures. In order to deal with these risks, decision-makers need to know about the actual effects of citizens' initiatives on public protest. So far, however, empirical research on these effects has been sparse. This study contributes to filling this gap by considering one specific aspect of the influence of citizens' initiatives. It isolates the causal effects of citizens' initiative membership on members' individual protest behavior in the context of the SuedLink. Controlling for various potential confounders, our results clearly indicate that the probability of performing protest behavior and the intensity of protest are substantially larger for members of citizens' initiatives than for non-members.}, language = {en} } @article{MuellerKeil2019, author = {M{\"u}ller, Christoph E. and Keil, Silke I.}, title = {Measuring perceived procedural fairness in the context of power grid expansion: A Rasch modeling approach}, series = {International Journal of Energy Sector Management}, journal = {International Journal of Energy Sector Management}, publisher = {Emerald}, address = {Bingley}, issn = {1750-6220}, doi = {10.1108/IJESM-02-2019-0002}, pages = {23}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Purpose - Governments and energy operators are often confronted with opposition to the construction of new high-voltage transmission lines. Besides other factors, a potential determinant of public opposition and acceptance that has gained increasing attention is the fairness of the planning and approval procedure as perceived by the citizens. The purpose of this study is to develop and validate a scale for measuring perceived procedural fairness (PPF). Design/methodology/approach - The authors developed the ten-item "perceived procedural fairness scale (PPFS)" and assessed its quality by means of item response theory. By using a Rasch rating scale model, the authors tested whether the instrument met the requirements of this kind of measurement model. For conducting their research, the authors used data from two telephone surveys in Germany that were collected in areas that are affected by grid expansion. Findings - The findings suggest that the scale can be considered a reliable and internal valid instrument for measuring citizens' PPF. Originality/value - At the moment, there is no psychometrically rigorously evaluated scale available for measuring PPF in the context of power grid expansion. Therefore, the study contributes to filling this gap and provides a valuable tool for researchers and practitioners concerned with further investigating citizens' PPF and its relationships with other relevant constructs in the field. Keywords - Policy, Procedural fairness, Procedural justice, Energy infrastructure, Power grid expansion, Item response theory, Rasch modelling}, language = {en} } @incollection{MuellerGaus2017, author = {M{\"u}ller, Christoph E. and Gaus, Hansj{\"o}rg}, title = {Quasi-experimental comparison group designs for social policy evaluation.}, series = {Handbook of social policy evaluation}, booktitle = {Handbook of social policy evaluation}, editor = {Greve, Bent}, publisher = {Edward Elgar}, address = {Cheltenham}, isbn = {978-1-78536-323-8}, publisher = {Deutsches Forschungsinstitut f{\"u}r {\"o}ffentliche Verwaltung}, pages = {38 -- 56}, year = {2017}, abstract = {kein Abstract verf{\"u}gbar}, language = {en} } @article{MuellerEngewald2018, author = {M{\"u}ller, Christoph E. and Engewald, Bettina}, title = {Making transparency work: Experiences from the evaluation of the Hamburg Transparency Law}, series = {Central European Public Administration Review}, volume = {16}, journal = {Central European Public Administration Review}, number = {2}, publisher = {University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Administration, Slovenia}, address = {Ljubljana}, pages = {69 -- 90}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Freedom of information acts (FOIA) aim to improve the public's opportunities to access official information from public authorities and hence to increase the level of transparency. Thus, it is important to know whether and to what degree the effects intended by establishing FOIAs are achieved and how their implementation could be improved. Hence, this article presents the evaluation of the Hamburg Transparency Law (HmbTG)- Germany's first FOIA that binds authorities to disclose government information proactively. The purpose of the paper is to provide a valuable example of how evaluating FOIA might produce useful information for policymakers and public authorities. The analysis results, based on a mixed set of methods (i.e. standardised surveys, statistical secondary data, qualitative expert interviews, and criteria-driven document analysis), lead to the conclusion that the HmbTG was very effective in providing the direct access. On the other hand, it was found that strategies for implementing the law varied considerably between authorities, yet proactive disclosure was overall implemented effectively. Moreover, this law shows some weaknesses to be improved in the future. Besides providing practitioners with valuable insights into how a transparency law may be implemented, the evaluation of the HmbTG also provides researchers with ideas how FOIA evaluation might be conducted comprehensively.}, language = {en} } @article{MuellerAlbrecht2019, author = {M{\"u}ller, Christoph E. and Albrecht, Maria}, title = {Crowdsourcing in der Evaluationsforschung: Neue M{\"o}glichkeiten f{\"u}r die Erhebung von Daten}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Evaluation}, volume = {18}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Evaluation}, number = {1}, publisher = {Waxmann}, address = {M{\"u}nster}, issn = {1619-5515}, pages = {134 -- 139}, year = {2019}, abstract = {.}, language = {de} } @article{Mueller2016, author = {M{\"u}ller, Christoph E.}, title = {Wirkungsbewertung mittels retrospektiver Pretests: eine kritische W{\"u}rdigung}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Evaluation}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Evaluation}, publisher = {Waxmann}, address = {M{\"u}nster}, pages = {221 -- 239}, year = {2016}, abstract = {.}, language = {de} } @misc{Mueller2016, author = {M{\"u}ller, Christoph E.}, title = {Zur Bewertung des ‚Societal Impacts' von Forschung}, organization = {Deutsche Universit{\"a}t f{\"u}r Verwaltungswissenschaften}, year = {2016}, abstract = {.}, language = {de} } @incollection{Mueller2017, author = {M{\"u}ller, Christoph E.}, title = {Kausale Wirkungsevaluation zwischen methodischem Anspruch und empirischer Praxis}, series = {Die Zukunft der Evaluation - Trends, Herausforderungen, Perspektiven}, booktitle = {Die Zukunft der Evaluation - Trends, Herausforderungen, Perspektiven}, editor = {Stockmann, Reinhard and Meyer, Wolfgang}, edition = {1. Aufl.}, publisher = {Waxmann}, address = {M{\"u}nster}, isbn = {978-3-8309-3708-1}, publisher = {Deutsches Forschungsinstitut f{\"u}r {\"o}ffentliche Verwaltung}, pages = {205 -- 222}, year = {2017}, abstract = {kein Abstract verf{\"u}gbar}, language = {de} } @misc{Mueller2017, author = {M{\"u}ller, Christoph E.}, title = {Maschinelles Lernen im Evaluationskontext}, organization = {Universit{\"a}t des Saarlandes}, year = {2017}, abstract = {keine Zusammenfassung verf{\"u}gbar}, language = {de} } @misc{Mueller2017, author = {M{\"u}ller, Christoph E.}, title = {Lernende Algorithmen im Evaluationskontext}, year = {2017}, abstract = {nicht verf{\"u}gbar}, language = {de} } @misc{Mueller2017, author = {M{\"u}ller, Christoph E.}, title = {Methodische G{\"u}te von Evaluationen: Eine Frage des Designs}, organization = {Deutsches Forschungsinstitut f{\"u}r {\"o}ffentliche Verwaltung}, year = {2017}, abstract = {nicht verf{\"u}gbar}, language = {de} } @article{Mueller2018, author = {M{\"u}ller, Christoph E.}, title = {Der deutsche Beitrag zur begutachteten Evaluationsliteratur im 21. Jahrhundert}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Evaluation}, volume = {17}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Evaluation}, number = {1}, publisher = {Waxmann}, pages = {53 -- 79}, year = {2018}, abstract = {.}, language = {de} } @article{Mueller2018, author = {M{\"u}ller, Christoph E.}, title = {Treatment effect estimation using self-estimated counterfactuals under varying conditions: A meta-analytic exploration}, series = {Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluation}, volume = {14}, journal = {Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluation}, number = {30}, publisher = {The Evaluation Center}, address = {Kalmazoo, Mich.}, pages = {16 -- 36}, year = {2018}, abstract = {.}, language = {en} } @misc{Mueller2018, author = {M{\"u}ller, Christoph E.}, title = {Mehr Transparenz in der {\"o}ffentlichen Verwaltung? Die Evaluation des Hamburgischen Transparenzgesetzes}, year = {2018}, abstract = {.}, language = {de} } @article{Mueller2019, author = {M{\"u}ller, Christoph E.}, title = {Effects of spatial proximity to proposed electric power lines on residents' expectations, attitudes, and protest behavior: A replication study}, series = {Energy Policy: The International Journal of the Political, Economic, Planning, Environmental and Social Aspects of Energy}, journal = {Energy Policy: The International Journal of the Political, Economic, Planning, Environmental and Social Aspects of Energy}, number = {130}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam}, issn = {0301-4215}, doi = {10.1016/j.enpol.2019.04.018}, pages = {341 -- 346}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Governments and energy operators are frequently confronted with opposition to the construction of new highvoltage transmission lines. In this context, a recent experiment by Mueller et al. (2017) tested the so-called proximity hypothesis and found that spatial proximity to proposed transmission line corridor route alternatives significantly affected residents' likelihood of having negative risk expectations, showing low levels of support, and engaging in protest against the planned facility. Moreover, their findings suggest that the relationship between spatial proximity and the dependent variables is appropriately modeled by a distance decay function, showing that effects attenuate with increasing distance from the infrastructure site. Unfortunately, because of the fact that the study is the only one that has tested the proximity hypothesis in the context of planning new trans-mission lines so far, the existing evidence cannot be considered as a solid knowledge base. Therefore, to strengthen the reliability of the existing evidence, the natural experiment of Mueller et al. (2017) has to be replicated, which is the purpose of the present study. The findings of the replication clearly support the results provided by Mueller and colleagues and provide further empirical evidence that strengthens the proximity hypothesis in the context of power grid expansion.}, language = {en} } @article{Mueller2019, author = {M{\"u}ller, Christoph E.}, title = {Evaluating Freedom of Information Laws: Objectives, Approaches, and Practical Considerations}, series = {International Journal of Public Administration}, volume = {42}, journal = {International Journal of Public Administration}, number = {12}, publisher = {Taylor \& Francis}, address = {Philadelphia, Pa.}, issn = {0190-0692}, doi = {10.1080/01900692.2019.1575663}, pages = {1020 -- 1030}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Freedom of information (FOI) laws aim to improve the public's opportunities to access official information from public authorities and hence to increase the level of transparency. Thus, it is important to know whether and to what degree the effects intended by establishing FOI laws are achieved and how their implementation could be improved. In order to answer these questions, FOI laws have to be evaluated. Unfortunately, attempts to evaluate FOI laws are still in their infancy. To promote sound evaluation, this article aims to provide guidance on how comprehensive FOI law evaluations might be designed and conducted.}, language = {en} } @article{Mueller2020, author = {M{\"u}ller, Christoph E.}, title = {Examining the inter-relationships between procedural fairness, trust in actors, risk expectations, perceived benefits, and attitudes towards power grid expansion projects}, series = {Energy Policy}, volume = {141}, journal = {Energy Policy}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam}, issn = {0301-4215}, doi = {10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111465}, year = {2020}, abstract = {.}, language = {en} } @techreport{HerrMuellerEngewaldetal.2017, author = {Herr, Marius and M{\"u}ller, Christoph and Engewald, Bettina and Piesker, Axel and Ziekow, Jan}, title = {Abschlussbericht zur Evaluation des Hamburgischen Transparenzgesetzes}, address = {Speyer}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0246-opus4-27582}, pages = {370}, year = {2017}, abstract = {Das Hamburgische Transparenzgesetz (HmbTG) trat am 6. Oktober 2012 in Kraft und l{\"o}ste damit das vorhergehende Hamburgische Informationsfreiheitsgesetz (HmbIFG) ab und entwickelte dieses an entsprechenden Stellen weiter. Als erstes Bundesland schuf Hamburg damit eine gesetzliche Grundlage f{\"u}r ein umfassendes Informationsrecht, durch das {\"o}ffentliche Stellen verpflichtet werden, Informationen proaktiv und nicht erst auf Anfrage der Allgemeinheit unter Wahrung des Schutzes personenbezogener Daten in einem sog. Transparenzportal als Informationsregister zur Verf{\"u}gung zu stellen. \S 18 Abs. 2 S. 3 HmbTG sieht vor, dass der Senat das Gesetz sp{\"a}testens vier Jahre nach Inkrafttreten im Hinblick auf seine Anwendung und Auswirkungen {\"u}berpr{\"u}ft und der B{\"u}rgerschaft {\"u}ber das Ergebnis berichtet. Die Ziele des Evaluationsauftrags sind es, die - Erm{\"o}glichung der Kontrolle staatlichen Handelns, - F{\"o}rderung der demokratischen Meinungs- und Willensbildung sowie die - Gew{\"a}hrleistung des unmittelbaren und unverz{\"u}glichen Zugangs zu Informationen f{\"u}r die Allgemeinheit unter Wahrung des Schutzes personenbezogener Daten mit Hilfe von rechts- und sozialwissenschaftlichen Methoden zu untersuchen.}, subject = {Evaluation}, language = {de} } @article{HerrMuellerEngewaldetal.2018, author = {Herr, Marius and M{\"u}ller, Christoph E. and Engewald, Bettina and Ziekow, Jan}, title = {Transparenzgesetzgebung in Deutschland in der Bew{\"a}hrung}, series = {Die {\"o}ffentliche Verwaltung}, volume = {71.}, journal = {Die {\"o}ffentliche Verwaltung}, number = {5}, publisher = {Kohlhammer}, address = {Stuttgart}, issn = {0029-859X}, pages = {166 -- 174}, year = {2018}, abstract = {.}, language = {de} } @book{HerrMuellerEngewaldetal.2018, author = {Herr, Marius and M{\"u}ller, Christoph E. and Engewald, Bettina and Piesker, Axel and Ziekow, Jan}, title = {Das Hamburgische Transparenzgesetz in der Praxis}, edition = {1. Aufl.}, publisher = {Nomos}, address = {Baden-Baden}, organization = {Deutsches Forschungsinstitut f{\"u}r {\"o}ffentliche Verwaltung}, isbn = {978-3-8487-4523-4}, publisher = {Deutsches Forschungsinstitut f{\"u}r {\"o}ffentliche Verwaltung}, pages = {512}, year = {2018}, abstract = {\S 18 Abs. 2 Satz 3 des Hamburgischen Transparenzgesetzes (HmbTG) sieht vor, dass der Senat das HmbTG im Hinblick auf seine Anwendung und Auswirkungen sp{\"a}testens vier Jahre nach dem Inkrafttreten {\"u}berpr{\"u}ft und der B{\"u}rgerschaft {\"u}ber das Ergebnis berichtet. Mit der Durchf{\"u}hrung der Gesetzesevaluation wurde das Institut f{\"u}r Gesetzesfolgenabsch{\"a}tzung und Evaluation (InGFA) am Deutschen Forschungsinstitut f{\"u}r {\"o}ffentliche Verwaltung (F{\"O}V) in Speyer beauftragt. Der Evaluationsbericht wurde vom InGFA im September 2017 vorgelegt. Der Erfolg jeder Gesetzesevaluation beruht maßgeblich auf den zur Verf{\"u}gung gestellten und erhobenen Daten. F{\"u}r den Zugang zu dem hier verarbeiteten Datenmaterial m{\"o}chten wir uns in erster Linie bei den Mitarbeiterinnen und Mitarbeitern der Justizbeh{\"o}rde der Freien und Hansestadt Hamburg bedanken. Ebenfalls danken wir den Mitarbeiterinnen und Mitarbeitern der Fachlichen Leitstelle beim Staatsarchiv, die uns bei der Umsetzung unserer Online-Umfragen unterst{\"u}tzt und damit die M{\"o}glichkeit gegeben haben, die Nutzerinnen und Nutzer des Transparenzportals zu befragen. Dar{\"u}ber hinaus vermittelten sie uns wertvolles (technisches) Wissen {\"u}ber die IT-Struktur und deren Aufbau. Besonderer Dank gilt allen Teilnehmerinnen und Teilnehmern der Online-Befragungen und der Experteninterviews. Die zur Verf{\"u}gung gestellten Daten und pers{\"o}nlichen Erfahrungen bilden die Grundlage f{\"u}r die hier vorliegende umfangreiche Evaluation des Gesetzes.}, language = {de} } @article{GausMueller2017, author = {Gaus, Hansj{\"o}rg and M{\"u}ller, Christoph E.}, title = {A two-step approach to evaluating sustainability-related consumer education interventions}, series = {Journal of Cleaner Production}, volume = {25}, journal = {Journal of Cleaner Production}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam}, pages = {1850 -- 1859}, year = {2017}, abstract = {The characteristics of creative educational interventions and the way they are implemented in the field often make their evaluation a challenging task. This article uses an exemplary intervention from a large-scale consumer education program on climate protection to present the design, method, and results of a two-step evaluation procedure which allows evaluators to cope with such a situation. Step 1 aims to answer the question of whether or not an intervention actually has the intended effects. Step 2 then assesses the factors that contribute to those effects. Thus, such a two-step evaluation yields information, not only on which interventions are effective and should therefore be maintained, but also on how they should be designed to achieve maximum effects.}, language = {en} } @misc{BauerHerrEngewaldetal.2018, author = {Bauer, Christian and Herr, Marius and Engewald, Bettina and M{\"u}ller, Christoph E.}, title = {Interdisziplin{\"a}res Arbeiten in der Verwaltungswissenschaft: Die Evaluation von Gesetzen}, organization = {Deutsche Universit{\"a}t f{\"u}r Verwaltungswissenschaften}, year = {2018}, abstract = {keine Zusammenfassung verf{\"u}gbar}, language = {de} }