@misc{Wieland2018,
  author    = {Wieland, Joachim},
  title     = {Streit um Grundgesetz{\"a}nderung: Digitalpakt auf dem Weg in den Vermittlungsausschuss},
  series = {Legal Tribune Online},
  journal   = {Legal Tribune Online},
  publisher = {Wolters Kluwer},
  address   = {K{\"o}ln},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {.},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{Seckelmann2019,
  author    = {Seckelmann, Margrit},
  title     = {Digitalisierte Verwaltung - Vernetztes E-Government},
  editor    = {Seckelmann, Margrit},
  edition   = {2., v{\"o}llig neu bearbeitete Aufl.},
  publisher = {Erich Schmidt Verlag},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {978-503-18139-1},
  publisher      = {Deutsches Forschungsinstitut f{\"u}r {\"o}ffentliche Verwaltung},
  pages     = {756},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Das Handbuch behandelt das Verh{\"a}ltnis von Digitalisierung und Verwaltung auf der Basis der aktuellen Rechtslage unter Einschluss der Datenschutz-Grundverordnung.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Callewaert2018,
  author    = {Callewaert, Johan},
  title     = {Do we still need Article (6)2 TEU? Considerations on the absence of EU accession to the ECHR and its consequences},
  series = {Common market law review},
  volume    = {55},
  journal   = {Common market law review},
  number    = {6},
  publisher = {Kluwer Law International},
  address   = {Alphen an den Rijn},
  pages     = {1685 -- 1716},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Article 6(2) TEU provides that the EU shall accede to the European Convention on Human Rights. However, the EU accession project has been significantly delayed by Opinion 2/13 of the ECJ. At the same time, there appears to be some harmony in the case law of the two European Courts, which could lead to the status quo being considered as a valid alternative to EU accession. It might therefore be tempting to remove Article 6(2) altogether from the TEU at the next revision of the Treaties. This paper argues that Article 6(2) should stay in the TEU, because a closer look reveals that the current status quo is not satisfactory: it does not allow an adequate representation of the EU in the procedure before the European Court of Human Rights, nor is it capable of ensuring in the long-term comprehensive and stable consistency between EU law and the Convention. Moreover, removing Article 6(2) TEU would undermine the very idea of a collective understanding and enforcement of fundamental rights. This could initiate a process leading to the current European architecture of fundamental rights protection being unravelled altogether. Hence, there is no return from Article 6(2) TEU. Neither is there from actually implementing it.},
  subject      = {Europ{\"a}ische Menschenrechtskonvention},
  language  = {en}
}
@techreport{SchweizerWillwacherZiekow2018,
  author    = {Schweizer, Patrick and Willwacher, Hanna and Ziekow, Jan},
  title     = {Der Erf{\"u}llungsaufwand von Gesetzen},
  publisher = {Stiftung Familienunternehmen},
  address   = {M{\"u}nchen},
  organization    = {Stiftung Familienunternehmen},
  isbn      = {978-3-942467-63-6},
  pages     = {44},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Die Erf{\"u}llung gesetzlicher Vorgaben kann bei Unternehmen hohe Kosten verursachen. Diese werden {\"u}ber das Konzept des „Erf{\"u}llungsaufwands" durch die Bundesregierung erfasst und gesteuert. Doch nicht alle tats{\"a}chlich anfallenden Kosten werden bisher ber{\"u}cksichtigt. Im Rahmen eines Projekts wurden vier Ansatzpunkte f{\"u}r eine Weiterentwicklung des Erf{\"u}llungsaufwands identifiziert, um Kosten umfassender abzubilden.},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Steffens2018,
  author    = {Steffens, Carolin},
  title     = {Ein Pionier},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Vortrag zur elektronischen Nachhaltigkeitspr{\"u}fung (eNAP) als erstes Web-Tool f{\"u}r die Gesetzesfolgenabsch{\"a}tzung auf Bundesebene.},
  subject      = {Gesetzesfolgenabsch{\"a}tzung},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{OPUS4-3865,
  title     = {The Legislative Choice between Delegated and Implementing Acts},
  editor    = {Tauschinsky, Eljalill and Weiß, Wolfgang},
  publisher = {Edward Elgar},
  address   = {Cheltenham},
  isbn      = {978-1-78811-522-3},
  publisher      = {Deutsche Universit{\"a}t f{\"u}r Verwaltungswissenschaften},
  pages     = {288},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Piesker2018,
  author    = {Piesker, Axel},
  title     = {R{\"u}ckkoppelungen der Wirkungen des Rechts},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Der Vortrag besch{\"a}ftigt sich mit der Frage, welche Funktionen Gesetzesevaluationen im politischen Entscheidungsprozess haben und zeigt anhand von drei Gesetzesevaluationen im Politikfeld "Innere Sicherheit", wie und vom wem die Evaluationsergebnisse genutzt wurden.},
  subject      = {Evaluation},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Willwacher2017,
  author    = {Willwacher, Hanna},
  title     = {Institucionalizaci{\´o}n de la evaluaci{\´o}n legislativa ex-ante en Alemania},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {.},
  language  = {es}
}
@misc{Willwacher2017,
  author    = {Willwacher, Hanna},
  title     = {La evaluaci{\´o}n legislativa ex-ante en Alemania},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {.},
  language  = {es}
}
@misc{Willwacher2017,
  author    = {Willwacher, Hanna},
  title     = {La evaluaci{\´o}n legislativa: objetivo y tipos},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {.},
  language  = {es}
}