Instead of Conclusions - More Questions

  • Arts. 290 and 291 TFEU are notoriously hard to differentiate. However, there is some evidence that a separation on the basis of substantive regulation through delegated acts and procedural specifications by implementing acts is forthcoming. The substantive – procedural differentiation is not very clear cut, but it affords the institutions flexibility in answering new challenges while at the same time exerting some guiding force. This Conclusion describes the separation of delegated and implementing acts along the substantive – procedural differentiation but also points to problems ahead. Thus, constitutional ambiguity, an inappropriate reliance on pre-Lisbon doctrine and the lack of a common vision continue to plague the law on EU administrative rule-making. To find a way to fulfil the promise of simplification that is part of the Lisbon reform, the EU institutions will all need to take the procedural safeguards around delegated and implementing acts more seriously.

Export metadata

Metadaten
Author:Eljalill Tauschinsky, Wolfgang Weiß
ISBN:978-1-78811-522-3
Parent Title (English):The Legislative Choice between Delegated and Implementing Acts in EU Law: Walking a Labyrinth
Publisher:Edward Elgar Publishing
Place of publication:Cheltenham
Editor:Eljalill Tauschinsky, Wolfgang Weiß
Document Type:Part of a Book
Language:English
Date of Publication (online):2019/01/04
Publishing Institution:Deutsche Universität für Verwaltungswissenschaften
Publishing Institution:Deutsches Forschungsinstitut für öffentliche Verwaltung
Release Date:2019/01/04
Tag:EU; delegated acts; differentiation; implementing acts
GND Keyword:Europäische Union; Verwaltungsrecht
First Page:233
Last Page:250
Documents ordered by chairs:Lehrstuhl für Öffentliches Recht, insbesondere Europarecht und Völkerrecht (Univ.-Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Weiß)
Documents of the German Research Institute for Public Administration (FÖV):Sonstige Schriften
Licence (German):License LogoUrhG – es gilt deutsches Urheberrecht