Refine
Year of publication
- 2020 (4) (remove)
Document Type
- Book (4) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- no (4) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (4)
Keywords
Institute
- Lehrstuhl für Öffentliches Recht, insbesondere Europarecht und Völkerrecht (Univ.-Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Weiß) (2)
- Lehrstuhl für Öffentliches Recht, Staatslehre und Rechtsvergleichung (Univ.-Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Karl-Peter Sommermann) (1)
- Lehrstuhl für Öffentliches Recht, insbesondere deutsches und europäisches Verwaltungsrecht (Univ.-Prof. Dr. Ulrich Stelkens) (1)
Verfolgen die Mitgliedstaaten der Europäischen Union bei der Umsetzung des Unionsrechts unterschiedliche Anpassungsstrategien oder lassen sich die jeweiligen Regelungen zur Umsetzung eher situativ deuten? Der vorliegende Band untersucht in einem ersten Teil, welche Veränderungen in der Verwaltungsorganisation und dem Verwaltungsverfahren die Umsetzung von Richtlinien aus dem Bereich des Umweltschutzes in ausgewählten EU-Mitgliedstaaten bewirkt hat. Der zweite Teil befasst sich daran anknüpfend speziell mit der Transformationswirkung von Richtlinien auf die nationale Regulierungsverwaltung im Energiesektor. Der Band versteht sich als ein Beitrag zur EU-Implementationsforschung.
This book is about the existence and effectiveness of written and unwritten standards of good administration developed within the framework of the Council of Europe (CoE). It analyses the (possible) impact of these standards on and their added value for the domestic administrative law of the CoE’s forty-seven Member States (representing more than 800 million people). This book argues that these standards, called here the ‘pan-European general principles of good administration’
The book explores the impact of WTO law on domestic regulatory autonomy. It identifies and critically analyses the mechanisms working in WTO law that cause increasing interferences with domestic law and thus restrain the regulatory autonomy of the WTO members. The book proposes ways how WTO law be conceptualized to enhance the policy space of WTO members. Therefore, the book demonstrates the flexibilities in interpreting and applying WTO core principles and provisions and explores interpretive and institutional conceptions that could serve as a pathway of allocating greater policy leeway to WTO members.
The analyses presented address the disturbing observation that even though WTO law appreciates the regulatory leeway of WTO members in several provisions across agreements, the WTO judiciary´s case law, but also other governance mechanism active in the WTO appear to narrow down the WTO members´ regulatory autonomy and to considerably limit the space for domestic policy choices. Wide spread, even scholarly perception of the WTO, and most recently the Trump administration blame the WTO, in particular its dispute settlement branch, for being biased towards free trade and unduly restraining even legitimate domestic policies, and voiding the domestic policy space needed for addressing societal concerns and global problems. A closer look at the development of GATT/WTO law, however, reveals that, in GATT era, panels were aware of the effect their interpretations had on domestic policy space, and that some of the more recent WTO dispute settlement reports show attempts to expand WTO member´s leeway again. These observations are the starting point for an indepth analysis of the different mechanisms present in WTO law which impact on domestic regulation.