Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Part of a Book (64)
- Article (62)
- Public lecture (42)
- Conference Proceeding (26)
- Contribution to a Periodical (22)
- Review (15)
- Part of a commentary (8)
- Book (7)
- Other (2)
- Contribution to online periodical (1)
Language
- German (142)
- English (36)
- French (33)
- Spanish (28)
- Other Language (11)
- Multiple languages (1)
Has Fulltext
- no (251) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (251)
Keywords
- Deutschland (2)
- Europa (2)
- Geschichte (2)
- Verwaltungsgerichtsbarkeit (2)
- Direttive (1)
- Implementazione (1)
- Unione Europea (1)
- Unione Europea, direttive, implementazione (1)
Institute
- Lehrstuhl für Öffentliches Recht, Staatslehre und Rechtsvergleichung (Univ.-Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Karl-Peter Sommermann) (248)
- Lehrstuhl für öffentliches Recht, insbesondere allgemeines und besonderes Verwaltungsrecht (Univ.-Prof. Dr. Jan Ziekow) (2)
- Lehrstuhl für Verwaltungswissenschaft und öffentliches Recht (Univ.-Prof. Dr. Hermann Hill) (1)
- Lehrstuhl für Öffentliches Recht, insbesondere deutsches und europäisches Verwaltungsrecht (Univ.-Prof. Dr. Ulrich Stelkens) (1)
The German Federal State
(2020)
Die Debatte über einen Funktionswandel der Verwaltungsgerichtsbarkeit in Deutschland, die in den vergangenen Jahren im Kontext der Umsetzung der Århus-Konvention geführt wurde, hat die großen Anpassungsleistungen anderer europäischer Staaten zur Verwirklichung eines effektiven Individualrechtsschutzes in den Hintergrund treten lassen. Angesichts wachsender Anforderungen an die gerichtliche Kontrolle bei hochkomplexen Sachfragen und schwierig zu erfassender Interessenvielfalt gewinnen zudem neue Formen der Konfliktlösung und Über-legungen zu einer veränderten Rollenverteilung zwischen Verwaltung und Verwaltungsge-richtsbarkeit weiter an Bedeutung. Im Kontext der europaweiten Ansätze zur Entwicklung von „E-Justice“ intensiviert sich die Debatte, inwieweit die Digitalisierung zur Funktionsfähig-keit des Verwaltungsrechtsschutzes und zu einer Steigerung der Verfahrensrationalität beitragen kann.
Article 9 (Social Aims)
(2021)
It has long been a commonplace that the European Union forms a community of law and that the principle of “integration through law” is one of its central characteristics. In view of the growing scope and complexity of Union law, which requires ever new adaptations from the Member States, research on the implementation of Union law, which also works empiri-cally, is gaining considerable importance. An international research project conducted at the German Research Institute for Public Administration was dedicated to the implementation and adaptation strategies of selected EU Member States. It investigated the transposition of organisational and procedural requirements for national administrations as laid down in EU directives related to environmental and energy policy. The investigation focused on various modalities of transposition: minimum transposition (“copy out”), the enactment of provisions that create obligations going beyond the requirements of the Directive (“gold-plating”) and the extension of the rules or principles of the Directive to other fields of law (“spill-over”), either by including a subject area not provided for in the Directive in the scope of application of the transposition provisions (spill-over in the narrow sense) or by fundamentally reforming a legal area on the occasion of the Directive (spill-over in the broad sense). The comparative analysis revealed a low degree of strategic use of transposition modalities. However, there is a growing awareness among Member States that they belong not only to a law community, but also to an implementation community. This is not least due to the mechanisms and procedures of intertwining Union and national action.