Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (40) (remove)
Language
- Other Language (40) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (40)
Keywords
- Germania (4)
- Appalti, parere precontenzioso, Vergabekammern, rimedi giustiziali (1)
- COVID-19; emergenza sanitaria; federalismo; Germania; diritti fondamentali (1)
- Cambiamenti climatici (1)
- Covid-19 (1)
- Federalismo (1)
- Germania; coronavirus; Stato di diritto; emergenza (1)
- Gestione del territorio (1)
- Italia (1)
- Perequazione finanziaria (1)
Institute
- Lehrstuhl für Öffentliches Recht, Staatslehre und Rechtsvergleichung (Univ.-Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Karl-Peter Sommermann) (5)
- Lehrstuhl für Öffentliches Recht, Finanz- und Steuerrecht (Univ.-Prof. Dr. Joachim Wieland) (2)
- Lehrstuhl für Öffentliches Recht, insbesondere deutsches und europäisches Verwaltungsrecht (Univ.-Prof. Dr. Ulrich Stelkens) (2)
- Lehrstuhl für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsmanagement (Univ.-Prof. Dr. Michael Hölscher) (1)
Funktionen der Korrekturlesung am Beispiel der englischen Übersetzung des neuen ungarischen Verwaltungsgesetzes
Extraterriotrialitätsfragen des Rechts auf Vergessenwerden
In the case, Brzeziński v. Poland, the European Court of Human Rights for the third time addressed the issue of the summary electoral proceedings in the Polish legal system. The last judgement is an excellent opportunity to examine if the provisions of the electoral law concerning these proceedings are well designed and correctly interpreted by the Polish courts. There is no doubt that free elections and freedom of expression together form the bedrock of any democratic system. The two rights are inter-related and operate to reinforce each other. For this reason, it is particularly important in the period preceding an election that opinions and information of all kinds are permitted to circulate freely. On the other hand, national authorities are legitimised to create special proceedings in order to ensure the proper conduct of the electoral campaign by preventing the dissemination of false information. As a consequence, it is possible to verify factual statements contained in the materials pertaining to an electoral campaign. Special proceedings should not apply to the value judgements. If such comments and opinions infringe the candidate’s personal rights, he or she may seek redress under the general rules of protection of individual rights.
In the field of public procurement EU law has deeply regulated not only the awarding procedures of public contracts of works, supplies or services (and since 2014 of concession contracts) but also the related review mechanisms. EU directives allow member states to decide upon the identification of the “bodies responsible for review procedures” (breviter “review bodies”) in charge of determining a possible breach of public procurement directives and whether such review bodies should or should not be judicial in character.
The essay focuses on the comparison between the implementation given to those rules by the German law, especially regarding the Vergabekammern (“Public procurement tribunals”), which are non-judicial review bodies in charge of first instance decisions, and by Italian law, where the new pre-litigation advice of ANAC (i.e. Italian Anti-Corruption Authority) has been introduced since 2016, in addition to the traditional judicial remedies, as an optional and ancillary non-judicial remedy.
Hoe belangrijk achten burgemeesters het initiëren van leerprocessen na afloop van een crisis? En waar hangen deze keuzes mee samen? In maart 2019 publiceerde het internationale wetenschappelijke tijdschrift Safety Science een artikel van Wout Broekema, Jan Porth, Trui Steen en René Torenvlied over de leeractiviteiten van burgemeesters na afloop van een crisis. Hieronder bespreken wij enkele bevindingen van het onderzoek. De resultaten zijn gebaseerd op een statistische analyse van de gegevens uit een enquête die is afgenomen onder alle Nederlandse burgemeesters in het najaar van 2015.