Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (105)
- Part of a Book (62)
- Review (21)
- Book (20)
- Conference Proceeding (14)
- Contribution to a Periodical (12)
- Public lecture (11)
- Part of a commentary (10)
- Report (4)
- Interview (2)
Language
- German (188)
- English (75)
- Other Language (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (265)
Keywords
- Europäische Union (6)
- Verwaltungsrecht (3)
- EU (2)
- Europäischen Union (2)
- Zollunion (2)
- delegated acts (2)
- differentiation (2)
- implementing acts (2)
- ACCC (1)
- Aarhus convention (1)
Institute
- Lehrstuhl für Öffentliches Recht, insbesondere Europarecht und Völkerrecht (Univ.-Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Weiß) (265) (remove)
Democratization of good global governance: The EU's role in the Parliamentarization of trade policy
(2022)
The quest for good governance in trade relations occurs against the backdrop of an increa-sing politicization of trade policy. In the new reality of global value chains and servitisation, regulating trade goes far beyond technical issues of reducing entrance barriers, border measures and tariffs, but becomes a comprehensive endeavour of scrutinizing and policing behind-the-border political issues. Therefore, a call for raising the legitimacy of trade policy formulation and implementation rises. Hence, parliamentarisation of trade policy is ever more necessary. The EU's constitutional development and its practice in trade policy is a good example for more parliamentary involvement, which strengthens trade policy's legi-timacy, transparency, and public awareness. Thus, the EU indeed is, despite all weaknesses,
a pacemaker and hence good global actor to the benefit of democratisation of global trade governance, being an essential factor of good governance.
Defining the EC Borders
(2003)
Das Beihilferegime
(2014)
Wolfgang Weiss’ contribution on “Constitutional Challenges to EU Administrative Soft Law During the Covid-19 Pandemic and Some Proposed Remedies” Studies how during the Covid-19 pandemic, as EU member states struggled to deal with the pandemic, EU officials increasingly resorted to so-called “soft law” to provide guidance to member states. He concludes that, while there are benefits to using EU soft law for crisis management and domestic implementation of EU, he raises concerns regarding their challenges for democratic legitimacy and the rule of law. He contends that these challenges should be addressed by a legislative enactment that sets forth a general framework for the adoption of EU soft law, core elements of which should be stipulations of subsidiarity vis-a-vis executive rulemaking and minimum procedural, transparency and justification requirements for the adoption of Commission soft law. Their domestic effects and reviewability should be clarified as well.
Biofuels and WTO Law
(2011)
Außenwirtschaftsbeziehungen
(2012)
Außenwirtschaftsbeziehungen
(2015)
Außenwirtschaftsbeziehungen
(2014)
Außenwirtschaftsbeziehungen
(2013)
Außenwirtschaftsbeziehungen
(2018)
Außenwirtschaftsbeziehungen
(2017)
Außenwirtschaftsbeziehungen
(2020)
Außenwirtschaftsbeziehungen
(2022)
As WTO members increasingly invoke security exceptions and the first panel report insofar was issued in Russia-Traffic in Transit, the methodical and procedural preliminaries of their adjudication must be reassessed. The preliminaries pertain to justiciability and to the proper interpretive approach for their vague terms that seemingly imply considerable discretion to WTO members, all the more as general exceptions are subject to expansive interpretation. Reading security exceptions expansively appears not viable as they miss the usual safeguard against abuse (i.e. the chapeau of Arts XX GATT/XIV GATS). This lack of safeguards rather suggests caution in conceptualising them expansively, as do the systemic consequences of recent attempts to re-politicise security exceptions which run the risk of nullifying the concept of multilateral trade regulation altogether. Furthermore, the appropriate standards of review and proof must be explored which have to strike a balance between control and deference in national security.
Die achten Speyrer Europarechtstage zu aktuellen Fragen des Beihilferechts fanden vom 26.-27.9.2016 an der Deutschen Universität für Verwaltungswissenschaften statt. Unter der wissenschaftlichen Leitung von Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Weiß zog die Tagung mit über 200 Teilnehmern auch dieses Jahr viele Experten aus der Praxis und Wissenschaft an. Die Vorträge gaben einen praxis-orientierten Überblick unter anderem zur neueren Rechtsprechung der Unionsgerichte, der Prüfung von Großprojekten, Rechtsfragen des Betrauungsaktes, der Neuregelung der AGVO für Flug- und Seehäfen und zum Beihilfebegriff der Kommission. In seinen einleitenden Worten hob Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Weiß die Aktualität der diesjährigen Tagungsthemen hervor. Als beherrschend nannte er in diesem Jahr vor allem die Kommissionsmitteilung zum Begriff der Beihilfe, sowie die Urteile und Schlussanträge zum Thema Selektivität und Transparenz.
Die Lissabonner Verträge haben die EU grundlegend transformiert. Eine der Gemeinschaften ist in der EU aufgegangen -- die andere, Euratom, besteht aber weiter. Im Lichte der tiefgreifenden Veränderungen, vor denen die EU im Zuge des Austritts eines Mitgliedstaates steht, ist das Verhältnis zwischen der EU und Euratom grundlegend zu klären. Wie verhält sich die Mitgliedschaft in der EU zur Mitgliedschaft in der Euratom? Der vorliegende Beitrag kommt zu dem Schluss, dass trotz getrennter rechtlicher Existenz beider Organisationen eine Mitgliedsschaft nur in beiden gleichzeitig möglich ist.
untitled document
(2016)
untitled document
(2016)