Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (40)
- Part of a Book (24)
- Public lecture (14)
- Book (12)
- Part of a commentary (6)
- Contribution to online periodical (6)
- Conference Proceeding (4)
- Review (3)
- Lecture (2)
- Other (1)
Language
- Other Language (113) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (113) (remove)
Keywords
- Germania (11)
- assicurazione sociale (2)
- federalismo (2)
- sanità (2)
- ADR (1)
- Appalti pubblici, tutela giurisdizionale, private public law divide (1)
- Appalti, parere precontenzioso, Vergabekammern, rimedi giustiziali (1)
- COVID-19; emergenza sanitaria; federalismo; Germania; diritti fondamentali (1)
- Cambiamenti climatici (1)
- Convenzione di Aarhus informazione ambientale (1)
Institute
- Lehrstuhl für Öffentliches Recht, Staatslehre und Rechtsvergleichung (Univ.-Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Karl-Peter Sommermann) (15)
- Lehrstuhl für Öffentliches Recht, insbesondere deutsches und europäisches Verwaltungsrecht (Univ.-Prof. Dr. Ulrich Stelkens) (7)
- Lehrstuhl für Öffentliches Recht, Finanz- und Steuerrecht (Univ.-Prof. Dr. Joachim Wieland) (2)
- Lehrstuhl für Öffentliches Recht, insbesondere Europarecht und Völkerrecht (Univ.-Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Weiß) (2)
- Lehrstuhl für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsmanagement (Univ.-Prof. Dr. Michael Hölscher) (1)
Wolność wypowiedzi w Internecie: O roli mediów społecznościowych i pozytywnych obowiązkach państwa
(2022)
Modern online communication processes are characterized by the growing role of private entities (social media) and the emergence of numerous conflicts of a horizontal nature. This paper examines these issues from the standpoint of the ECtHR’s theory of positive obliga-tions. Consequently, it analyses the impact of new technologies on the freedom of expres-sion, the paradigm shift in communication, and the State’s positive obligations to prevent horizontal abuses. The article also analyses the existing and planned legal framework (national and EU). The main argument of this article is that public control over social media should be strengthened. Limiting their discretion to ensure adequate protection of rights and freedoms does not mean, however, the freedom of forum, understood as an unlimited right of access to the platform in order to express opinions.
This note aims to provide a critical defintion of "sustancial changes" in the sense of the EU 2014/24 Directive on public procurement. (in Dutch)
Uniós szakpolitikák
(2019)
Proportionaliteit
(2020)
This note aims to provide a short critical definition of the principle of proportionality as it is used in the EU procurement (in Dutch).
The essay examines changes in German law on administrative procedure recently introduced to address the challenge of digitization. This reform was undertaken in the framework of the very complex German legal system, which has federal structure, as well as the so-called “three pillars” of general administrative, financial and social security procedures, and a tradition of homogeneous development. The article also investigates the links between administrative procedural law and the legislation on e-government, as well as the problem of the poor interoperability of the IT systems of the various levels of government (Federation, Länder and Municipalities), that the (federal) law on online access to public services proposes to solve. Finally, the potential and limits of digitization of administrative procedure are examined, distinguishing binding and routine measures (easily automated) from the new frontiers of artificial intelligence.