Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Public lecture (48)
- Article (42)
- Part of a Book (38)
- Report (15)
- Book (7)
- Other (5)
- Review (5)
- Working Paper (4)
- Contribution to online periodical (2)
- Course Material (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (167)
Keywords
Vorliegender Forschungsbericht behandelt die wahrgenommenen Bürokratielasten der kommunalen Ebenen in Nordrhein-Westfalen. Der Bericht bildet die empirische Grundlage für den in 2022 veröffentlichten Bericht der Transparenzkommission Nordrhein-Westfalen. Die Landesregierung Nordrhein-Westfalen hat die Transparenzkommission eingerichtet, um nordrhein-westfälische Kommunen zu stärken und sie in Bezug auf Bürokratielasten durch das Land zu entlasten. Zentral ist dabei die Erarbeitung von Vorschlägen zu Bürokratieabbau durch Aufgabenkritik und Standard-Überprüfung. Die Grundlage dafür bildet eine Befragung der Gemeinden, Kreise und Landschaftsverbände in NRW, die eine möglichst solide Daten-grundlage für die weitere Arbeit der Transparenzkommission bilden soll. Der Band berichtet die wesentlichen Ergebnisse der Befragung und ordnet sie in die Diskussion über den Abbau von Bürokratielasten und eine zeitgemäße Aufgabenkritik ein.
Die öffentliche Verwaltung tritt in Evaluationsprozessen als Auftraggeberin, durchführende Instanz oder als Evaluationsgegenstand auf. Aufgrund der sehr unterschiedlichen Evalua-tionspraxis im Handlungsfeld und des Öffentlichkeitsbezugs, aus dem sich besondere Rechenschaftspflichten ergeben, sollte die Berücksichtigung spezifischer Standards wie beispielweise der DeGEval-Standards selbstverständlich sein. Gleichwohl zeigt zumindest die oberflächliche und teilweise anekdotische Evidenz des Beitrags, dass die DeGEval-Standards im Handlungsfeld „Öffentliche Verwaltung“ nur eine nachgeordnete Rolle spielen, vielfach sogar sowohl bei Auftraggeberinnen/Auftraggebern als auch bei Evaluatorinnen/Evaluatoren unbekannt sind.
The European Semester is an instrument for coordinating and monitoring the economic and fiscal policies of the EU member states. However, since the European Commission explicitly emphasizes the importance of the countries’ public administration for economic growth, it seems reasonable to assume that the member states’ bureaucracy will also be addressed within the framework of the European Semester. This article therefore examines the admi-nistrative policy ideas and reform proposals of the European Commission by analysing the annual country-specific recommendations addressed to all EU member states between 2011 and 2019 under the European Semester. Applying quantitative text analysis to all CSRs during the investigation period shows that the European Semester is used to a considerable extent to propose administrative reforms to the Member States. Out of the 466 reform proposals identified, more than half were related to either the management of public finances or the administrative structure in the member states. On the average (without Greece), each country received 17,3 reform proposals with administrative policy implications over the entire period. However, the differences between the EU member states are significant, as can be seen from the distribution of the reform proposals.
Public officials have been shown to discriminate against citizens based on race and gender. We suggest that bureaucrats also discriminate based on political beliefs that citizens reveal to them. We support this argument with evidence from the application of freedom of assembly rights in the context of gay marriage. We confront German city administrations with requests about the organization of a political rally and randomize the underlying political belief and cause: the promotion of or opposition to same-sex marriage. We find that none of these causes receives discriminatory treatment per se. Instead, further explorative, yet theory-guided, analysis indicates that the cultural and political environment within which bureaucracies are embedded determines which of the two requests receives worse and less helpful answers. I.e. the treatment effect seems to be moderated by the local prevalence of Catholicism and the strength of sexually conservative political parties that oppose same-sex marriage.
Academia and practitioners agree that the local level is crucial for EU cohesion. However, further conceptual and empirical development is needed. The paper introduces an under-standing of European cohesion consisting of a horizontal and a vertical dimension, covering individuals' relationships with each other and the polity. We review the predominantly nation-state-focused, interdisciplinary literature on support for the European Union (vertical dimension) and societal Europeanization (horizontal dimension) through a 'local lens', arguing in favour of combining the two dimensions in one framework of cohesion. We derive empirical expectations about the role of local agency for European cohesion and operationa-lise European cohesion, thus designing a coherent framework for analysing the local foundations of European cohesion.